The word “fascist” has been bandied about so much in the past number of years, I fear it’s lost its meaning and we’ll have to come up with new words to describe those who behave fascistically while projecting their beliefs and behavior onto those they deem their “enemies”. Enemy meaning all who disagree with them. I do believe that was the protocol of the Third Reich: arrest and/or kill those who disagree.
Humans have had a long, sad history of fighting against the psychopaths who invariably end up as the rulers in our so-called civilized societies. The psychopaths maintain their position by creating a group that everyone else can despise. Sometimes it’s been Christians, sometimes tories, sometimes Blacks, sometimes communists or fascists or socialists or democrats or republicans, sometimes untouchables. And then there’s the Jews, the chosen people for both g-d and bigots alike.
In the past, many people were smart enough to see past the lies, the manipulation, the indoctrination, the narrative of the ruling class. Prior to 10/7, I knew nothing about the history of the Muslim religion or its belief system. Because I knew nothing, I also did not know what to think. So I read a number of books and watched hundreds of You Tube videos, including interviews with Palestinians who clearly knew very few of the actual facts about their religion or their history in Palestine. When people can be fooled into believing that “Jesus was born in Palestine”, that our mutual forefather, Abraham also was a Muslim when the history is quite clear that he (very cruelly) rejected Ishmael.
I have not read the Koran yet, but I have listened to and read those who have. I learned from ex-Muslims that the Koran written in English is not the same as that written in Arabic. I also read a biography of Mohammed, who became rich through theft, murder and his ability to attract followers. His followers were/are told that the fastest way to achieve Paradise was and is to kill Jews and die for allah. They were told that no matter what, always play the victim. I surmise that he decided to hate the Jews when they refused to accept his belief that he was a prophet at all, let alone the final prophet.
The Muslim belief is that those who are Muslims are superior to all others. I acknowledge that many Americans seem to be taught the same about being American and we have not acted that differently than the worst of Islamists, in that they (and the U.S.) have colonized many countries using violence to defeat those who fought back. The United States itself is a prime example. Except that the U.S. has secular law and a Constitution. The Muslim countries have sharia law, theocratic and authoritarian. Perhaps putting ourselves in the shoes of the Israel-Palestine conflict might be somewhat of an illustration of the issue.
Is there a statute of limitation on stolen land? Because clearly the land was stolen, not from the colonizing Arab Palestinians but from the Jewish people, expelled more than once from their indigenous land. Interestingly, all those who opposed the Jews have disappeared from history, but the Jewish people, despite (perhaps due to) millennia of persecution, not just survive, but thrive. Using the Cherokee as an example, what if they were offered just a quarter of one of their states back, say Florida. And what if the Cherokee, happy to have just a part of their land back agreed, but the Floridians refused saying it was all or nothing. And what if the Floridians declared open season on the Cherokee Nation as land thieves, referred to them as colonizers from Oklahoma, as that is where they were sent following the Cherokee Death March, also known as the Trail of Tears. that forced march which, if it happened today, would be rightly called ethnic cleansing.
So what if the present day Cherokee took the deal, but the Floridians refused it claiming all of Florida belonged to them by right, that it was a lie that the Cherokees had ever been there, that the Floridians were justified in terrorizing, raping and beheading them as all Cherokees deserved to die. And then, for good measure, proving they were right in their savagery toward the Natives, they chanted the clever rant they had purchased from their P.R. group: “From the gulf to the ocean, Florida will be free.”
What if there were two ways to handle this problem? What if the first way was to compensate the landowners and assist them in relocating? And what if the second way was for the U.S. government to designate certain parts of Florida to be returned to the Cherokee for their own country and the majority of Floridians left the designated area, stateless, because they were unwilling to share land with people they were accustomed to seeing as their inferiors? Which do you suppose would be more successful in creating an actual solution?
Or how about Mexico? The entire southwest was stolen from them. How would those currently raging at “the Zionists” react to a band of Mexican terrorists invading what is now U.S. territory in order to commit murder and mayhem, raping women, committing vicious crimes against the population including torture and murder, and then leaving with a large number of hostages. Of course were they to be compared fairly to what happened to Israel, the Mexican terrorists would have to murder 30,000 Americans, including those with Mexican descent. That would equate to the 1200, or 1% of Israeli men, women, children, infants murdered on 10/7/23. Would these same people be as determined that the U.S. not fight back, not defend itself so that their enemy will assume they are free to continue to attack? Would they consider that defense to be “genocide”? Or is it only wrong when Jews fight back? Taking this back to the Israeli-Palestinian problem, or should that more accurately be presented as the Jewish-Muslim problem. Palestine has never been a country. It was a land with many settlers following the repeated expulsion of the indigenous Jewish population. The population was diverse, Arabs, Jews and Christians as well as some even smaller tribal populations.
Although the U.K. was mandated by the League of Nations following WW1 to create a Jewish state of Palestine, they chose to give 80% of the land to Jordan, one of the 22 established Arab-Muslim states. The U.K. also prevented Jewish migration to the area after it became clear what Hitler’s agenda was. So yes, there were more Arabs than Jews in the area, no big surprise. We might ask Mark Twain who visited the area in the late 19th century and called Palestine an empty wasteland with a very sparse population.
Finally, the U.K. mandated what was pretty much swampland and desert for the creation of Israel which the Jews turned into a thriving country. Meanwhile, the Arabs who were permitted to speak for the Palestinian Arabs decided on no state as long as there were Jews in Palestine. I interpret that as the Arab method of holding their breath until they get their way. A small number of Arab Palestinians remained in their homes after the land was designated for the Jewish population. They became citizens of Israel. On the other side, close to a million Jews were expelled from the Arab countries as a result of the Israeli state being created. Those who react without thought are out in the streets protesting the “Jewish apartheid”; the apartheid that doesn’t exist while ignoring the opposite which does exist.
They are also decrying the “genocide” of the poor, “brown” Palestinians, 75 years of refugee status and counting. They’ve grown from less than a million in population in 1947 to over five million, In the 1920’s, the religious leader al-Husseini, was designated as the Grand Mufti, once again by the U.K. al_Husseini was a psychopath and a Jew hater who spent WW2 in nazi Germany where he was paid as a consultant to work alongside Adolf Eichmann. He is still seen as a great leader by the Palestinian population who may or may not be forgiven for the fact that they are so heavily indoctrinated from a young age to be the worst of Islam, that some of them (how many?) are capable of becoming vicious psychotic and unapologetic torturers, rapists and murderers for Islam.
Western apologists have no problem justifying their actions. After all, they had the nakba 78 years ago so that makes their behavior acceptable. Of course, the Jews were expelled from 14 countries 1000 years before Muslim was created as a severely twisted version of Judeo-Christian beliefs. And possibly 100 times since - including by Mohammed.
I would like to challenge the western apologists for such evil to determine even once that the Jewish people responded to expulsion, persecution or their own ghetto-ized lives, living amongst the antisemitic Christians in Europe and the antisemitic Arabs in the East, as the Palestinian Arabs have repeatedly behaved. In fact it is very rare to find the victims of injustice and persecution reacting with the same viciousness shown by the Palestinians. Reacting violently toward their oppressor is fairly common among exploited populations. Planting bombs on buses and trains, raping, torturing, beheading innocents, seems to be a Jihadi specialty and of course their religion, unlike all others, is sacrosanct and must never be criticized, although they are permitted by their “religion” to murder those who reject their religion.
While they cry “apartheid” because of the wall built to keep them in Gaza and out of Israel, two things they fail to mention. One is their constant attacks on Israel and the other is that Egypt has built an even bigger wall to keep the Palestinians out - while assisting them in smuggling weapons into Gaza. But I assume the lack of Jews in Egypt mitigates against Egypt being the evil enemy that is Israel to so many “useful idiots”* in the west. Perhaps people need to remind themselves that in 1947, the Arab Palestinians are decrying their “nakba” when 300,000 people lost their homes in what became Israel, those who were given that land were also refugees who lost a lot more than their land. And Palestinian leaders were up to their eyeballs involved in the holocaust, with no argument from the Palestinian population.
*The phrase commonly used by those Muslims who’ve managed to escape this cult who seem to have a lot of anger at the support provided to the worst of this authoritarian/fascist belief system.
Everything the European Jews owned was stolen from them and the Palestinian “victims” had been hardcore fans of their persecutors. And it’s entirely possible they were more than just fans. Mein Kampf is still very popular in Arab countries today while the so-called “socialists” have insanely fabricated a false reality in which it is the Jews, the people who’ve created the single democracy in the Middle East, the singular country in which women have some rights, as well as the only country which does not either imprison or murder their homosexual citizens.
I keep wondering if what is occurring is the result of a government MKUltra-type experiment that has been highly successful in convincing people that fascism is democracy and democracy fascism. After all, they’ve been pretty successful in convincing vulnerable people that they can abracadabra-like change their sex. Not their race though because that is hard-core written in the stars that white is evil and non-white, no matter what, justified. These are the same people who think they can be saved by a mask and a jab administered by people with criminal records, a history of psychopathology and a depthless level of greed.
“Free Palestine” they cry. From what I ask. From their own leaders who’ve become billionaires at their expense? From a religion that is more of a death cult than a religion, whose very name “Islam” means to submit, to never question? But of course I am also for a free Palestine. In fact, I care so much about freedom for the Muslims, that I am eager to see, not just a free Palestine, but also a free Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Djibouti, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Yemen. All of them, to my knowledge have totalitarian governments, controlled by sharia law.
I understand Hitler was a big fan of Islam, it’s brutality far better suited to Germany he thought than the sentimentality of Christianity. It is basically an authoritarian, fascistic and deeply misogynistic belief system. Certainly would meet the approval of any group of billionaire megalomaniacs who sought control of the entire world. This, along with anti-semitism and misogyny is common in Muslim-colonized countries. It is common at times and in countries that are reverting to patriarchal authoritarianism.
It is quite upsetting to me to see people and movements that claim to be left-wing so open to acceptance of a clearly right-wing agenda. Is it something in the water? Fluoride perhaps? Or all the plastic particles so many of us ingest or the toxins sprayed on our fruits and vegetables. Or unknowingly eating gmo’s. Or what they are spraying above our heads. How do so many otherwise intelligent people fall so completely for what is clearly a fascist agenda while attacking the victim of that fascism?
The Muslim religion has captured the minds of over one and a half billion people. The penalty for leaving they say is death, but that is also the penalty for not accepting this system which calls itself a religion but seems far more like a political movement. Naomi Wolfe has said she will never again reside in a country which practices inequality, meaning Israel. Is there any other country besides Israel from whom so much is expected? Certainly not Palestine and certainly not what they refer to as their religion which permits the wholesale murder of unarmed civilians, but it’s Israel supposedly committing genocide.
We have known forever that the Muslim community has no problem murdering those they consider enemies. They do so proudly, publicly, unashamedly. They’ve even been known to eat the organs of their victims. Except this is no longer the seventh century and this kind of savagery would have been best left there. It should be neither accepted nor enabled by the western fans, and supporters of this vicious savagery. There is room for criticism of every religion in existence now or in the past. But there is only one currently that seeks to dominate the planet, that justifies the most brutal homicidal behavior in the interests of their religion, that in its holy books claims that only those who adhere to this one belief system should have any rights at all and of those, only the male half.
Their population has grown exponentially through convert or die conquest. Men are allowed four wives, although Mohammed himself had far more including the 6 year old Aisha. Young Muslim girls today traditionally adopt the hijab at the age of 9 to “honor” the consummation of this marriage when Aisha turned nine. Women have no rights and can, by sharia law, be beaten if they oppose their husband The penalty for not adhering to the oppressive edicts is death as is simply deciding this belief is not for them. In many of these countries a woman must cover her hair and sometimes her face or her entire body must be hidden as well. In some Muslim countries she can be punished for speaking in public since a woman’s voice can also be “tempting” to a man (or perhaps more likely annoying).
Obviously the need for women’s silence doesn’t apply in the west where we must be subjected to Muslim-indoctrinated women screaming falsely that they want a “free” Palestine. There are no “free” Muslim countries. They are all, to one extent or another, controlled by their adherence to a religion that denies their right to freedom.
The difference a belief system can make can be clearly seen by the difference in Nobel Prizes awarded for benefits to humankind to members of each group. The percentage of Nobel Prizes awarded to Jews is about 25%, with a global population of 0.2%. The percentage of Nobel Prizes awarded to Muslims is about 0.8% with a global population of approximately 23%. I do believe this is the result of an oppressive religion that requires devotion to it, rather than devotion to making the world a better place. Quite clearly the Muslim religion is not about making the world a better place. Except of course for those who sit at the top of it. My question is are our western oppressors also involved in pushing this death cult religion on the west. It’s starting to look that way.
Discussion about this post
No posts
Very informative
Wonderful title